Rjack wrote:
Did you notice that I documented the legal authority to support my legal assertion? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=EEOC+v.+Waffle+House%2C+Inc&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Did you notice that the ruling you cite asserts precisely the opposite of what you would like? <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1823.ZS.html>: Held: An agreement between an employer and an employee to arbitrate employment-related disputes does not bar the EEOC from pursuing victim-specific judicial relief, such as backpay, reinstatement, and damages, in an ADA enforcement action. In our analogy, the employer is the code grabber, the employee is the code user, and the EEOC is the SFLC, stepping in to pursue victim- specific judicial relief. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
