Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
You're misreading 17 USC 109.
Not in any way relevant to your argument. The only way to make a
copy of a GPLed work to convey to others is through the license
granted by the GPL. Not that I mind, and I'm prepared to continue
doing this forever, but we've been through this before, when you
did not seem to understand that restrictions on the form of
copying that a copyright holder grants are utterly routine.
You are attempting to conflate scope of use restrictions under
17 USC 106(1): to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or
phonorecords;
with scope of use restrictions under 17 USC 106(2): to prepare
derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
That's a no-no Hymen and is definitely not routine.
(You apparently did not know or believe that book authors sell
hardcover and paper- back publication rights separately despite
the fact that they are both for the same exact set of words.)
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
