ZnU wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, > Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > > > > > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > > > > [... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...] > > > > And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content > > > > just like the Actiontec itself? > > > > > > Because things are murky when it comes to deciding who is > > > responsible for making copies when a user asks for a download > > > and a web server goes to another server to ask for the content > > > and transmits it to the user? > > > > Nothing is murky here. The owners of both servers are doing > > distribution. Both are distributors. > > Are the owners of all the routers between you and Verizon also > distributors?
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/512.html Verizon's distribution page (initiating/offering transmission) http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp doesn't fall under 17 USC 512. Don't you think so, ZnU? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
