Rjack <[email protected]> writes: >Why would I want to try that Rahul?
>Just read the prevailing law in the Second Circuit where the SFLC >filed its Busybox suits: >...Whether this requirement is jurisdictional is >not up for debate in this Circuit. On two recent occasions, we have >squarely held that it is"... Ah! A jurisdictional argument that you were treating as one of standing. This is why you should search for article III standing. It will clarify the difference between standing and jurisdiction. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
