Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> writes: >Rjack wrote: >> If SFLC and GPL supporters want to argue "victory"
>AT the end of the Verizon case, the router manufacturer made >the GPLed software available, where it had not been available >before the case. Actually this by itself is not victory. It means that for some period of time, typically 2-3 years, the vendor did not comply with the GPL. Victory would mean that the non-complying vendor paid a price for the period of non-compliance that exceeded the vendor's own idea of the benefit of not complying. It's quite possible that the vendors who are sued are paying such a price, but we don't know. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
