Hyman Rosen wrote: [...] > If someone chooses to copy and distribute GPLed code, > they can do so legally only if they accept the GPL, > because nothing else gives them permission to do this. > If they accept the GPL, they must follow its dictates. > > If someone copies and distributes GPLed code and does > not make the source properly available, then they are > in violation of copyright.
Why do you confuse the GPL "dictates" with the copyright, Hyman? It is like confusing an alleged breach (and enforcement) of a rental contract between a landlord and a tenant with violation (and enforcement) of http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/trespassing laws. Stop being such an idiot. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
