Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:21:14 -0400, Rjack wrote:
You have it backwards. When *sun* licenses software, IBM
likes apache/ BSD type licenses. When *IBM* licenses
software, ie gnu/linux, IBM likes the gpl.
You Freetards never learn. For Christ's sake, IBM was the
World's first viscous computer monopolist.
Well, asshole's like you never see the obvious: of course it
would've been in IBM's interests to have never released any
source code at all.
At the time, after Micro$oft had wiped IBM's ass with their OS/2
dreams it made sense to make tons of money off the Freetards Linux
services market.
If you think IBM didn't learn the meaning of "embrace, extend and
extinguish" from Micro$oft then you're a bigger Freetard moron than
I thought. Ever since Linux latched on to IBM's teat with Sequent's
SMP code contributions the "extinguish" handwriting has been on the
wall. IBM will wipe your socialist Freetard asses with the GPL.
Capitalism *always* wins.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
