Hyman Rosen wrote: > rat wrote: >> >> It is sort of cutting their own throat, though. If something has no >> commercial value, being free as in beer, any case asking for monetary >> damages for violating its copyright could simply result in a summary >> judgement for zero compensation. > >The infringers would still be enjoined from creating further copies, >which would be fine from a GPL enforcement point of view. I think the >FSF might consider the loss of monetary damages for themselves to be >a fair trade.
Rat thinks that their should not be any competition - that only one "best choice" vendor should exist in the market.. -- "It is better that there only be one supplier who really is the best so that everyone can have the best choice!" - Rat _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
