Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Copyright licenses are designed to support the right to exclude;Uhmm. Copyright licenses are designed to support the right to share the copyrights with other parties (licensees). This is completely opposite to the exclusion. The above just highlights the degree of mental disorder exhibited by the CAFC in that ruling.
Nonsense, of course. Were the rights holders not interested in the right to exclude, they would release the work into the public domain. The purpose of a license is to allow certain parties to do certain things based on certain conditions, and thus to exclude other parties, other actions, and those who disobey the conditions. Silly sophistry. Sad, really. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
