Rjack <[email protected]> claims that promissory estoppel would be a defense to copyright infringement of a GPL-licensed work because of the following alleged promise:
>"You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion >of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and >distribute such modifications or work. . ." It's called a promise >for a grant of rights. Doesn't promissory estoppel requires reasonable reliance on a promise? Why is it reasonable to rely on an out-of-context fragment? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
