ray <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote: > >> Rjack wrote: >>> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. >>> >>> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims >>> for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin. >>> >>> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and >>> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009) >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Rjack :) >> >> >> >> The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to >> account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant >> from its unlawful acts;" >> >> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf >> >> LMAO! They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt public >> charity. >> >> It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market for >> less than the cost to produce it. > > Well DooFuS, one could also argue it should be unlawful to dump > propietary code on the market for exhorbitant prices.
What did you pay for your fat free milk today Ray? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
