On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:24:57 +0200, Hadron wrote: > ray <r...@zianet.com> writes: > >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote: >> >>> Rjack wrote: >>>> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. >>>> >>>> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability >>>> claims for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard >>>> spin. >>>> >>>> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and >>>> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009) >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> Rjack :) >>> >>> >>> >>> The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to >>> account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant >>> from its unlawful acts;" >>> >>> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf >>> >>> LMAO! They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt >>> public charity. >>> >>> It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market >>> for less than the cost to produce it. >> >> Well DooFuS, one could also argue it should be unlawful to dump >> propietary code on the market for exhorbitant prices. > > What did you pay for your fat free milk today Ray?
Hey Hardon - FYI - I don't use fat free milk. Mostly heavy cream. Why should you care what it costs? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss