Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: > [...] >> > In Wallace v. FSF, the plaintiff claimed that the GPL covers collective >> > works as you suggest... >> >> I disagree that Wallace's claim was about collective works as I suggest. > > Try > > http://sco.tuxrocks.com/Docs/Wallace_v_FSF/Wallace_v_FSF-12.pdf
It's probably rather pointless to fight about what Wallace's claim was about: even after several admonishments he was not able to actually deliver something that was substantial enough to even count as a claim in the eyes of the court. If the judges weren't able to figure out a claim from that mess, the laymen here should likely not bother. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
