In article <[email protected]>, Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: >Joerg Schilling wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, >> Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thus, copyright holders of GPLed components grant permission for their >>> works to be copied as part of a collective work only if the work as a >>> whole is distributed under the GPL. And this applies best when the >> >> This is of course nonsense unless you have specific addition information from >> such authors. > >You need no such information, because this is what the GPL text specifies.
No, it does not. >> The GPL does not include a rule that would allow to make such a claim. > >Of course it does: > <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html> This is not the GPL but GPLv3, which is a less free variant.... People who speak about "the GPL" mean GPLv2 unless otherwise mentioned. -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
