Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Stop being utter idiot, Hyman. You just can't seriously believe that > > companies like Cisco and Broadcom would be able to sell products > > predicated on something that "generally appear to be distributed as > > separate packages that people are forever having trouble getting > > downloaded and installed." > > I assume they're providing limited support for hardware products > under Linux that normally come with proprietary drivers that run > under Windows. In any case, I don't have to believe anything. If > you wish to show me examples that you [sic, SFLC/FSF] believes > demonstrates that these companies are violating the GPL, feel > free to do so.
>From https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov: 1. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 2. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 3. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 4. Dismissal With Prejudice. (Busybox v. Verizon) 5. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 6. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 7. Dismissal Without Prejudice. 8. Dismissal With Prejudice. (FSF v. Cisco) regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
