Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes:
LOL
http://opensource.ulitzer.com/node/974408
I'm glad you can laugh at an article that says Rjack and you called
it wrong and everyone else is right.
Uhhh... I called it 100% correctly:
******************************************************
'Nuther voluntary dismissal contemplated
by Rjack 12 December 2008 • 8:46AM -0500
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-disc...@gnu....
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
*******************************************************
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[email protected]/10985785.html
The FSF will NEVER, NEVER, EVER voluntarily allow a court to review
the GPL on the merits. They will ALWAYS voluntarily dismiss their
frivolous suit because they know the GPL is legally unenforceable.
To date this pattern has occurred *seven* consecutive times.
ROFL
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
