Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
The inserted GPL library code is verbatim and unmodified.
Untrue - static linking makes changes to the inserted library
code as addresses are resolved. But that's probably not relevant.
The whole compilation is in no way "based" on unmodified GPL'd
> library code.
False. The GPL itself defines what it means by "based", and that
definition states that it describes a work other than a verbatim
copy whose production requires copyright permission.
Uh... you can't define your own copyright law and expect a federal
court to enforce your new definition. Read 17 USC sec. 301.
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
