David Kastrup wrote: [...] > GPL is a license, not a contract. Yeah.
LOL. Heck, why are you, German GNUtian dak, still pretending to be in denial regarding the judgments of the courts in Munich and Frankfurt about contractual status of the GPL, stupid dak? (Munich) http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf (Frankfurt) http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_frankfurt_gpl.pdf This was pretty much the only *uncontested* fact in both cases, silly dak. Please elaborate. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
