David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote: >> >> [... "the GPL is not a contract" ...] >> >> Both courts unequivocally said that the GPL is a contract. > > How comes you snip everything relevant from my reply before stomping > your feet again? As I already said: contract law applies since licenses > are held to the same standard. There are differences which I listed. > > You'll find that the courts did not rule on the side of "contract" > rather than "license" where any of those particular differences was > concerned. Sloppy language does not set legal precedence as long as it > does not make a difference regarding the _ruling_.
All immaterial of course since companies just steal the code, rearrange it a bit and close source it. Sad but that's life. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
