David Kastrup wrote: > > RJack <[email protected]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Most certainly the SFLC does not need to read the outpour of > >> self-proclaimed legal amateurs in this newsgroup in order to plan their > >> course of action. > >> > >> They have a quite better track record at predicting legal cases than the > >> most vociferous know-alls here. > >> > > > > Do you mean the eight frivolous suits the SFLC filed concerning BusyBox > > prior to Erik Andersen attempting to steal the other contributing > > developers' code contributions by fraudulently registering the BusyBox > > program ? > > > > The SFLC has a perfect track record. Every case they filed concerning > > Monsoon and BusyBox they dismissed before a judge could ever read one > > of their idiotic complaints. > > With the defendant coming into compliance and the source code being made > available. Since the defendants have been big corporations with big
Where is the "complete" source code (not to mention the GPL notice) corresponding to http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp binary you idiot? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
