On 2/1/2010 12:41 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/17/42
As usual, the linked article contradicts your thesis:
the decision shows that the court considered the
software to be licensed under the terms of the GPL
and attached legal significance to the terms.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
