Take your meds Hyman Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/1/2010 12:41 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/17/42 > > As usual, the linked article contradicts your thesis: > the decision shows that the court considered the > software to be licensed under the terms of the GPL > and attached legal significance to the terms.
and read the paragraph to its end. Don't miss also "My assertion that open source licenses are, in general, enforceable under Nordic laws does not mean that, in a particular case, each element of all licenses could be enforced." The permission element of the GPL can certainly be enforced AGAINST THE LICENSOR, stupid. But that's not WHAT YOU AND OTHER BRAINWASHED GNUTIANS MEAN BY THE GPL ENFORCEMENT, right silly? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
