David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > > > What evidence do you want from me stupid dak? That > > > > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp > > > > is not backed by the "complete corresponding source code" under the GNU > > GPL you silly? > > You got the links already.
Now tell me that you really tried to visit those links (Hyman's "Residential Help" links) and build the binaries from that 'source' you silly dak. Did you try that? regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. " Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane P.P.P.S. "We do not believe that the Copyright Act permits holders of rights under copyrights to choose third parties to bring suits on their behalf. While F.R. Civ. P. 17(a) ordinarily permits the real party in interest to ratify a suit brought by another party, the Copyright Law is quite specific in stating that only the "owner of an exclusive right under a copyright" may bring suit." Hyman's lovin' http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F3/402/881/510088/ -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
