Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> Calling something intentionally different a corresponding source without >> it being so in order to fulfill licensing conditions would be active >> fraud, not just negligence. > > Uh silly dak. Breaching unenforceable contractual "licensing > conditions" is "fraud" only in hilarious brain free zone known as the > GNU Republic.
Your attention span zeroed out again. We were not talking about "breaching", we were talking about deliberately creating a misleading impression of "not breaching". > LMAO! Uh retard Hyman. "Hyman?" Your attention span really is at zero right now. Have you been drinking again? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
