On 2/22/2010 6:48 PM, RJack wrote:
The Artistic License broadly *permits* copying and distribution just as Judge White originally found when he applied the correct Supreme Court precedents. Contractual covenants aren't grant conditioners. No end runs around the Supreme Court Hyman.
The Artistic License permits copying and distribution as long as certain conditions are met when doing so. The appeals court properly found that failing to abide by these conditions is copyright infringement. As I said a long time ago when Judge White made his original decision and before he was overruled by CAFC, get back to me once the Supreme Court overturns this. Meanwhile, it's court vs. crank. And court wins. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
