Uh retard dak. You wrote: "But the point is: until I pass the cash register, there is no way of knowing whether I had merely been employing my pocket because I was running out of space in my hands or because I intended to steal something."
That's not an evidence to rebutt presumption of intent to consummate a theft, stupid. In terms of German law, according to BGH: http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/ist-das-ladendiebstahl "Sobald ein Täter eine Ware in seine Kleidung oder in eine mitgeführte Tasche gesteckt hat, ist sein Gewahrsam begründet und damit der Diebstahl vollendet." Got it now? And, BTW, "Gewahrsam" above isn't confinement but rather http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gewahrsam as in http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Besitz stupid dak. "And the particular sentence makes little enough sense: "As soon as a perpetrator puts an item into his clothes or a carried bag, his confinement is justified, and thus the theft is completed." That's shaking the order and dependencies of the acts up rather absurdly." LMAO!!! regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
