On 4/9/2010 12:12 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.bitlaw.com/source/17usc/109.html

The First Sale doctrine has nothing to do with copyright
infringement of GPL-covered works, except in its usual
sense. In particular, a copy of a GPL-covered work made
for use does not become a copy which may be transferred
under 17 USC 109 without the GPL being honored, any more
than a time-shifted recording made for personal use is
such a copy.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to