Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> Comply with a small number of clearly spelled out conditions, and you >> are fine, breach, and you are in trouble. It's not a particularly hard >> concept unless you are a troll. > > Samsung (several other 'humongous' defendants aside for a moment): > > "Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claim for copyright infringement > is barred under at least the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as > Defendant was licensed and any copies alleged to be infringing were, > therefore, lawfully made."
Let's see the judge take them up on this and other allegations. I rather expect them to come into compliance and drop out of the suit via that way rather than a ruling. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
