"amicus_curious" <a...@sti.net> writes:

> "Hadron" <hadronqu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:rs3c97-ep1....@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Answer : yes they are. And no amount of whining and freetardery will
>> change that.
> Things are not that simple, else, why have lawyers?  If you, say, take
> a photograph of the Toledo skyline at nightfall and publish the image,
> you own the copyright to that image and no one can use it without your
> permission.

If you do that with the Paris skyline, however, you'll get sued by the
people having registered copyright for the light arrangement of the
Eiffel tower.

I am not joking.

David Kastrup
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to