Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 4/20/2010 9:31 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > With one court > > And how many court decisions have supported the crank > point of view while addressing open licenses?
The district court in that same case you retard and MySQL court in http://pacer.mad.uscourts.gov/dc/opinions/saris/pdf/progress%20software.pdf (alleged breach of the GPL is just a contract breach/not copyright infringement). In Wallace v. FSF the court also established that "open licenses" such as the GPL are contracts. Is that enough "courts" for you silly Hyman? regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
