On 4/20/2010 1:10 PM, RJack wrote:
This finding directly contradicts the Supreme Court's ruling that to infringe, an action must violate one of the "specific exclusive rights conferred by the copyright statute".
No, it's consistent with it - the violation was of the exclusive right to copy and distribute a work. And you sidestep the actual question, which was about how many court decisions have supported the crank point of view while addressing open licenses. The answer seems to be none, since the only decisions you quote are old ones that are not specifically addressing open licenses. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
