On 5/5/2010 10:52 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
rejected not allowed unenforceable NOT a proof can NOT be ignored
That's enough multiple negatives to open a wormhole to the crank universe of twist and spin. Your fellow crank asked for a judge who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored. I gave him a judge who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored ("I am not persuaded ... that the release of the ... source code ... didn't cure the breach.") None of your twisting and spinning can change the simple and obvious fact that here is a judge who does not believe that the terms of the GPL can be ignored. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss