"Carlos O'Donell" <car...@systemhalted.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mark Wielaard <m...@gnu.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >> >> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321...@gmail.com >> >> (below), sent a day ago to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org (which I am >> >> subscribed on and usually have no problems to post to), had not landed to >> >> the archive [0] for unknown reason — I did not get any failure >> >> notification. >> > >> > The list is [pre]moderated, simply wait till a moderator accepts or >> > rejects your messages. >> >> Funny. Either the moderators were so efficient earlier so I never noticed >> that, or thatʼs a fairly recent policy, that was introduced secretly (I do >> not see any announcement). May I ask, which it is? > > I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated discussions.
Thank you for clarification. I (and, I dare suppose, others too) will appreciate, if the next radical change in policy (in either direction) will be publicly announced to prevent misinterpretations. > It is entirely within the normal bounds of list management to use moderation. (Un)fortunately, I am not familiar with the list management within these bounds, so could you enlighen me, how should I get known, that my letter is rejected by a censor? Will I get a notification with the reason explained?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
