Hello,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:59:38PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Ok.  So that sounds like a good idea, but how is this different from
> what is sent to GNU maintainers today when they are dubbed as
> maintainer (I attached it at the end of this message)?  It seems to
> tick all the boxes...

maybe it ticks too many boxes... It is not quite a "short, concise
document". And it is also mostly technical. What is missing is the spirit
of the expected contributions, what it is all about, rather than a
technical guide of what to do in what situation. It is definitely not a
document which could found a community.

Andreas


Reply via email to