Hello, On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 12:36:52AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > > I do not see how the aim of creating a harassment-free environment could be > > construed as making GNU a less welcoming place... > In other words, the only real aim of your ‘social contract’ is to impose that > last paragraph about ‘harassment’ on everyone, while all the software freedom > stuff is just a decoration that should not be taken seriously?
sorry, this is plain nonsense. The document contains four points. You and other question the last point. In a reply, I defend the last point. How you can logically conclude that the first three points are "decoration" is beyond me. You may disagree with this point, other points or even the whole idea of the document (I understood this from another one of your messages), but please do not derail the debate with nonsensical arguments. Andreas
