At pleasure has a negative connotation in English, meaning that you do the bidding of someone else. This is simply not true in the relationship between the FSF and the GNU project, and has never been the csae.
So what you say is a gross misinterpretation, the FSF does not dictate anything regarding the nature of the GNU project and was created long after the GNU project was started as a means to safe guard our interests. So while they provide infrastructure, and legal advice, etc, it is for our needs. They do not do any type of oversight, or anything similar that we follow the software freedom mission. That falls on the responsibility of the Chief GNUisance.
