> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:38:37 +0100 > From: Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> > Cc: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com>, gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org > > Andy's (of course somewhat subjective, but reasonably debatable) criterion > of health of a package was "a release in the last three years".
No, that's not what the original blog says. It says that a package which had a stable release within the last 3 years is considered _active_. Not healthy, active. I don't think anyone will argue that Guile is not an active project. I certainly wouldn't.
