> Jan> Problem 2: at 1.00 am i make a typo in an url (but there's
> Jan> even an index.html in the containing directory)
>
> ugh. i just got time to get back into this discussion, and i can't
> see the stars-and-stripes output we're talking about. the file isn't
> even at the corrected url, nor is lily.ps. in fact, parts of your
>
Ah, sorry. After all the hacking last week, i decided that its good
enough to be move out of the test subdir and be put in our main
examples:
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/input/out-www/star-spangled-b
anner.ps.gz
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien/lilypond/input/out-www/star-spangled-banne
r.ps.gz
There's an index in each directory, that lists all the files, (and
ready-to-view
PNGs for your browser) e.g.
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/input/out-www/index.html
the link 'Examples' at lily's homepage takes you straight to this index.
We fixed tex to include of lily.ps, the're no need to get that
seperately.
Anyway, i can go about and explain these silly things, but it still
makes
me feel bad. We really need a good solution to these problems.
> lilypond site seem to appearing and disappearing as i look at them. i
> guess you're regenerating the site?
>
Perhaps Han-Wen was, my site's been up since saturday i guess.
> *sigh* i guess it's a neat idea to have the lilypond site generated
> by the latest version of lilypond, but it makes it frustrating to try
> to have a discussion when things keep changing and urls don't lead
> anywhere (like the coriolan and cembalo-partitas directories which
> have been empty for a long time...).
>
Yes. There's a simple explanation for this too. Until not so long ago
Han-Wen needed to build the website at home; it had to fit on a floppy.
So we removed some (big) examples. We're now putting some of them
back..
> it makes me wonder about a more static vs. the current dynamic site.
> more about that in the next post...
>
I'm not really sure what would be best either, more in the next post
