[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> are generated by the lilypond tarball, i finally despaired after
> following the endless maze of makefiles calling other makefiles ad
> infinitum, by which time the real world (tm) had caught up with me and
> demanded my attention again. about a week ago, i tried it again with
> the same result.
>
> and i'm torn on how to start, even if i could ponder the imponderable
> ball of string that is the lilypond source. i'm not sure whether to
> try to pull the resulting documentation into my own setup, or to try
> to contribute to the tarball directly so that the result of running
> "make website" is my fancier page. if we were to go through with
> registering lilypond.org as has been suggested in the past, what would
> be better for it, a more static page that may be slightly behind the
> times in some respects but more dependable, or one that is generated
> from the lilypond source and thus up-to-date but perhaps broken in
> some places?
I suggest to have a really funky attractive page that is the "portal"
to enter.
* It should be attractive
* It should be easy to use (with menus etc)
* It should have information that is not likely to go out of date.
* It should prominent links to the generated website
(that is not all that cute, but does present the bleeding edge of
development)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html
