Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Inspired by Wan-Wen's motto: 'Backward compatibility sucks',
> > I introduce on new option for mudela-book, and remove
> > two old.
> >
> > * Mudela-book will scan mudela-code to see if it has to
> > add paper-definition and \score{\notes{...}}
> > * If the code is only voice-contents (no \score):
> > linewidth = -1 (This makes 'fragment' obsolete)
>
> This is all nice, but I have another motto: "Programs that exhibit
> intelligent behaviour suck". In other words, what if I would like to
> do this:
>
> \begin{mudela}[fragment]
> % no \score { } here
> % no \paper either
> c4 c4
> \end{mudela}
> how would mudela-book cope? I think it would be best to allow these
> autodectected settings to be overridden.
I can let fragment nonfragment(better name??) override autodetection.
I have not tried the above code, but I guess the % will confuse mudela-book.
I will fix it. The autodetection is not failsafe yet.
Tom Cato
______________________________________________________
Get your free web-based email at http://www.xoom.com
Special clipart offer: http://orders.xoom.com/email
