On Monday, 20 March 2000, Alain CULOS writes:
> > Please englighten me, what's the difference between a real skip and a
> > weird skip? Anything except the simple quantise feature seems to get
> > real complex. Maybe a --no-rests would be an option (for the todo),
> > but I doubt if that would be really helpful for anything but the
> > simplest of tunes.
>
> Well I consider music like {c2}*19/32 \skip2;*11/32 or some such to be a bit
+ strange.
Of course. Isn't this fixed when you do --no-tuplets?
> Ok, I accept some tunes have complex rythms, but not all.
Yes. That's what the problem is, what's the difference between
a complex rhythm, and a weird rhythm? You and I can probably tell,
but what's the algorithm?
> And out of curiosity, why put a skip and not a rest ?
Hmm. Maybe there would be something to gain from --no-rests(/skips).
Could you send me a (preferably not too big) example MIDI that has
typically these '{c2}*19/32 \skip2;*11/32' things?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
