On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Jeffrey B. Reed wrote:
>
> Maybe preprocessing with m4 is more appropriate.
Well, that's a matter of taste. I find cpp easier to grok for simple tasks
like leaving out part of a file. The places, where pre-processing occurs
are also easier to spot. But for complex 'code-generation' tasks m4 would
be better.
harti
>
> Jeff
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 4/27/00, 11:46:30 AM, Laurent Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> regarding Re: Is lily magic ?:
>
>
> > >>>>> "Harti" == Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > >> However, it'd be nice to have option to ignore some parts of a
> > >> score. For those of you who want to hack bbut don't know what to
> > >> do :-)
>
> > Harti> Well, do it the UNIX-way: don't invent the wheel, if there
> > Harti> are already dozens out there. I use:
>
> > Harti> gcc -E -P -nostdinc -x c -traditional
>
> > Of course !!! How come I did not think about it ? ;-\
>
> > Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Jeffrey B. Reed
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
--
harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
