"James Hammons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Arg.
> > No no no. *Don't* do this, we'll get all kinds of different bug reports.
>
> Err, maybe for the stable release? This is (mostly) how JBR packages his NT
> installs (& the reason I like to do it this way is that it keeps things
> *very* simple)...
Moving stuff around is not making it any simpler.
All stuff (guile, tetex helper, lilypond) is configured to live in,
and find other stuff in /Cygwin/usr/bin, /Cygwin/usr/share/... etc.
ALso, the lilypond tarballs have lilypond configured for, and installed in
/Cygwin/usr/lilypond-x.y.z/bin,share
etc., so that you can easily install, remove and have different
versions alongside eachother (because you windows folk don't have a
decent package manager).
> Is it? Doesn't that tell configure (or make) what the type of processor to
> optimize for? If so, then having such a high processor requirement will
> leave lily useless for a lot of people (personally, I have an i586 at
> home)...
Trust me.
:-)
Greetings,
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
