gnu-system-discuss

Messages by Date

2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? bendikker
2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Alfred M. Szmidt
2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
2019/09/03 Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
2019/09/03 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? bendikker
2019/08/09 ARMv8-A port Marc Dunivan
2019/05/19 GNU Guix 1.0.1 released Ludovic Courtès
2019/05/04 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Dimakakos Dimos
2019/05/04 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Kete
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Jude Rubini
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released vikram sai balaji ulaganathan
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released David Pirotte
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Amirouche Boubekki
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Nala Ginrut
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Katherine Cox-Buday
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
2019/05/03 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019/05/02 Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Thompson, David
2019/05/02 GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Ludovic Courtès
2019/04/27 Re: Counting software and the laws Richard Stallman
2019/04/27 Counting software and the laws swedebugia
2019/02/06 Re: Release information for GZip Eric Blake
2019/02/06 Release information for GZip APCoEProductNotifications
2019/01/18 Re: Gnash is dead? Richard Stallman
2019/01/18 Re: Candidates for Decommission https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html Adam Sampson
2019/01/18 Candidates for Decommission https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html bendikker
2019/01/17 Re: Gnash is dead? Alfred M. Szmidt
2019/01/17 Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? Alfred M. Szmidt
2019/01/15 Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? bendikker
2019/01/15 Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? Richard Stallman
2019/01/15 Re: Gnash is dead? دانیال بهزادی
2019/01/15 Re: Gnash is dead? Patrice Dumas
2019/01/15 GNU package hello unmaintained? bendikker
2019/01/15 Gnash is dead? bendikker
2019/01/06 Re: gnu.org/software corrections Richard Stallman
2019/01/05 gnu.org/software corrections bendikker
2019/01/03 Re: Counting software and the laws Richard Stallman
2019/01/01 Re: Counting software and the laws Jean Louis
2019/01/01 Counting software and the laws znavko
2018/12/07 Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018/12/07 Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Pjotr Prins
2018/12/06 Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Pierre Neidhardt
2018/12/06 GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Ludovic Courtès
2018/07/06 GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.15.0 released Ludovic Courtès
2017/12/07 GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.14.0 released Ludovic Courtès
2017/10/04 Re: 2006 download link Ian Kelling
2017/10/03 2006 download link deltagi M
2017/06/02 ISOC poll hellekin
2017/05/23 Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Nala Ginrut
2017/05/23 Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Amirouche
2017/05/22 Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Nala Ginrut
2017/05/22 Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/05/22 Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.13.0 released Catonano
2017/05/22 Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Amirouche
2017/05/22 GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.13.0 released Ludovic Courtès
2017/03/23 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
2017/03/12 problem 5: GNU's Tor endorsement undermined (was: CloudFlare, not good choice) Anonymous
2017/03/12 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) carl hansen
2017/03/11 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
2017/03/11 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
2017/03/11 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/11 Re: GNU CDN? Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/11 GNU CDN? (was: CloudFlare, not good choice) Nomen Nescio
2017/03/11 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/11 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/11 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
2017/03/10 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Richard Stallman
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice Anonymous
2017/03/10 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
2017/03/10 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/10 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
2017/03/10 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/10 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/10 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/09 Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/09 CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/09 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/09 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues Anonymous
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/09 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Assaf Gordon
2017/03/09 Re: Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/09 Re: Paolo Bonzini
2017/03/09 [no subject] Anonymous
2017/03/09 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Jean Louis
2017/03/09 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/09 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
2017/03/08 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
2017/03/08 Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues Anonymous
2017/03/08 Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/08 state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Anonymous
2017/03/08 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/07 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/06 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/06 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/06 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/06 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/06 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/05 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/05 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/04 Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Mike Gerwitz
2017/03/04 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/04 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Filip Brcic
2017/03/04 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/04 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
2017/03/04 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/04 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/03 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/03 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 why Tor whitelisting is a bad idea (was: gnuradio project..) Nomen Nescio
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Filip Brcic
2017/03/03 [no subject] Nomen Nescio
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/03 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
2017/03/03 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/02 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript Paolo Bonzini
2017/03/02 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
2017/03/02 Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Filip Brcic
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Nomen Nescio
2017/03/02 GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Anonymous
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Filip Brcic
2017/03/02 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/02 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/02 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Richard Stallman
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
2017/03/02 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations Anonymous
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
2017/03/02 Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Nomen Nescio
2017/03/02 Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Anonymous
2017/03/02 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/02 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/01 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Svetlana Tkachenko
2017/03/01 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Ricardo Wurmus
2017/03/01 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/01 Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
2017/03/01 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Jean Louis
2017/03/01 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Jean Louis
2017/03/01 Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
2017/03/01 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
2017/03/01 Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users hellekin