it is a worse solution. If a system does not allow debugging failed boots, or debugging after boot when complex software like package managers and union filesystems fail (as they certainly will), it seems unlikely to be successful. Bugs (or misuses or ...) are inevitable; users need to have the tools necessary to figure out what is wrong and repair it.
You can always use a serial line to debug the boot, or use a known working system and debug the translators in a sub-hurd. This is really no different than having ext2fs, auth, proc, exec, password, etc, crash due to bugs or misuse. _______________________________________________ gnu-system-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss
