Hi, On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:05:48PM -0600, Michael Heath wrote:
> I think the problem people face is: Why work on something that is > already fundamentally obsolete or bad? It is not any more fundamentally obsolete or bad than most other software out there. We *know* that there are some fundamental issues with the current implementation. We *know* for example that performance will never quite match modern monolithic systems; that there are problems that can not be fully solved within the current design. This depends on what issues you are refering to. The two (semi-serious) problems that Marcus pointed out wrt to passive translators and firmlinks can be solved. As was pointed out by Bushenell, and someone else.
