gnu-system-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: GNU/Linux Activation Technologies Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: GNU/Linux Activation Technologies - You joke, but it's a reality now. GrSecurity is doing JUST THAT. nipponmail
  • Re: GNU/Linux Activation Technologies - You joke, but it's a reality now. GrSecurity is doing JUST THAT. Dmitry Alexandrov
• Re: Is negative publicity always harmful? - I support RMS' past "pro-paedo" statements gameonlinux
  • Re: Is negative publicity always harmful? - I support RMS' past "pro-paedo" statements nipponmail
  • Re: Is negative publicity always harmful? - I support RMS' past pro-paedo statements - Dear Alexandre François Garreau nipponmail
  • Re: Programmers as users Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Is negative publicity always harmful? - I support RMS' past "pro-paedo" statements gameonlinux
• Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? Ian Bentley
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? Jean Louis
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? Jean Louis
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]? gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Local politics in Software gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Local politics in Software Jean Louis
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - CoreBoot Dev weighed in. gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - CoreBoot Dev weighed in. - Translations gameonlinux
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - CoreBoot Dev weighed in. - Translations Kete via Discussions about the development of the GNU system
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). Svante Signell
  • Re: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). Dmitry Alexandrov
• Proposal: More GTK1 (and 2) programs. (Reviving use of these libraries in free systems, for efficiency and avoidance of lock-in) gameonlinux
  • Reviving GTK1 (and 2) Alexandre François Garreau
• Will RMS be back to Programming now? gameonlinux
  • Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now? Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now? Jean Louis
  • Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now? gameonlinux
  • Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now? Nala Ginrut
• Ping0 nipponpost
  • Re: Ping0 Adam Spiers
  • Re: Ping0 Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Ping0 Richard Stallman
  • Re: Ping0 nipponpost
  • Re: Ping0 - Reping. nipponpost
  • Re: Ping0 - Reping. nipponpost
  • Re: Ping0 - Reping. Alfred M. Szmidt
• Regarding Free Speech in Free Software: Proposal: Gnu2, or AGNU (anon GNU) nponmail
• Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? John Sullivan
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
• Why can't I send mail to this list? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why can't I send mail to this list? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why can't I send mail to this list? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why can't I send mail to this list? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why can't I send mail to this list? Dmitry Alexandrov
• (Censored) Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
  • Re: (Censored) Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Jean Louis
  • Re: (Censored) Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
• Testing new mail server Richard Stallman
  • Re: Testing new mail server Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: Testing new mail server Amirouche Boubekki
  • Re: Testing new mail server Mike Gerwitz
  • Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Mike Gerwitz
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Jean Louis
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Jean Louis
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why donÃ?¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Jean Louis
  • Re: Why donÃ?¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? gameonlinux
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto gameonlinux
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto gameonlinux
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto gameonlinux
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Magnesium (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto) Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: puri.sm (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto) Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: puri.sm (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto) Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: puri.sm Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Florian Weimer
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto nipponmail
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Florian Weimer
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Jean Louis
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto nipponmail
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why donÃ?¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server) Jay Sulzberger
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why donÃ?Å Ã?¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Jean Louis
  • Re: Why donÃ?Å Ã?¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Richard Stallman
  • Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? Richard Stallman
• Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Taylan Kammer
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Adam Spiers
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Adam Spiers
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Paul Smith
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Adam Spiers
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts - Simple git instructions gameonlinux
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts - Don't give up yet gameonlinux
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Paul Smith
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts - pain felt with git nipponmail
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Alexandre François Garreau
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Adam Spiers
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Adam Spiers
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
  • Re: Magit inclusion into GNU Emacs (was: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts) Dmitry Alexandrov
  • Re: Magit inclusion into GNU Emacs (was: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts) Richard Stallman
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Ian Kelling
  • Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts Richard Stallman
• systemd replacement or standardization František Kučera
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alexander Vdolainen
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization František Kučera
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alexander Vdolainen
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization František Kučera
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alexander Vdolainen
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alexander Vdolainen
  • (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: (html emails) Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Alexander Vdolainen
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Richard Stallman
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Richard Stallman
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization marinus.savoritias
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Richard Stallman
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Jean Louis
  • Re: systemd replacement or standardization Richard Stallman
• Thoughts on the Joint statement on the GNU Project Tirifto
  • Re: Thoughts on the Joint statement on the GNU Project Ruben Safir
  • Re: Thoughts on the Joint statement on the GNU Project Taylan Kammer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages