Thanks for the quick reply. Here is where I am with compiling...
The tar ball on the ftp site appears to only support the motif version? I
couldn't find a make target for gnome in the Makefile.
With the latest CVS version, I can get through the ./configure just fine.
"make gnome" ouput follows:
[walke@vann xacc]# make gnome
make FLAVOR=gnome build-flavor
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/xacc'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/xacc/lib'
(cd g-wrap && make)
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/xacc/lib/g-wrap'
cd . && aclocal
aclocal: configure.in: 33: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
make[3]: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/xacc/lib/g-wrap'
make[2]: *** [g-wrap-install] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/xacc/lib'
make[1]: *** [build-flavor] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/xacc'
make: *** [gnome] Error 2
Any ideas? I haven't put much time into figuring it out yet. I was still
hoping to go mindless with an RPM version...
Vann
Matt Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 05:38:22PM -1000, Vann H. Walke wrote:
> > Any chance of a 2.1 RPM being out there somewhere?
> >
> > I've been working on compiling 2.1 from the source code, but haven't had
> > much luck...
>
> It would help development if you could report the problems you're
> having in detail. They could either be (a) known problems that
> we have a fix or workaround for or (b) something new that we
> should know about.
>
> > A couple observations:
> >
> > - the documentation is hopelessly out of date (readme still
> > reports latest stable version as 1.0.x and often still refers
> > to the project as xacc.
> >
> > - ditto for the webpage
>
> Yes, GnuCash needs more volunteers!
>
> > - best I can tell there is NO version history information?
> > The last changes to the changelog were made sometime last
> > year
>
> Yeah, the ChangeLog isn't being maintained. I find them useful
> too.
>
> > If this is a "stable" release which is supposed to be usable
> > wouldn't it be appropriate to release binary versions?
>
> None of the lead developers run Red Hat, it seems.
>
> --
> matt
> ----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
> The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
