John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm glad for you and I wish you luck, but I suspect that this means that I > will have to add the features I need myself and maintain a local fork or > find something else. Why is that? We are improving gnucash, putting it into a box, and providing support and a printed manual. All the development we do on gnucash is and will be GPL. Of course you're welcome to maintain a local fork, but I don't understand why that would be necessary. Are there features you need which you think won't be put into gnucash, or do you dislike the idea of your work going into a product that someone else sells? If the latter, I believe that gnucash is currently on Red Hat's contrib CDs and is very likely to be on other Linux resellers' CDs before too long. Is there a substantive difference between Red Hat selling a CD set that includes gnucash versus someone else selling a package containing just gnucash and related documentation? I don't mean to be argumentative; I'm just a little surprised by your reaction and I'd like to understand it better. Thanks, Bill Gribble -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
