On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, John Hasler wrote: > It would be necessary if I came up with changes that make gnucash suitable > for my purposes but are not acceptable to the authors. I already have one: > I changed all the weird labels to "debit" and "credit" but did it via an > ugly hack that should not go into CVS. The authors seem happy with the > weird labels: I assume that they match those used in some popular Windows > package. Actually, I will argue that gnucash should be "internationalized" in a form that allows you to add "Hasler-ish" to the list (English, German, Russian, etc.) > Yes. The one thing that keeps me from using gnucash in my business is the > fact that the balances of detail accounts do not appear as entries in > parent accounts. I don't think I can add this myself in any reasonable > length of time and I get the impression that the gnucash authors consider > this the wrong thing to do. I neither understand what or why you want this. A REPORT should be able to "flatten" a tree of subaccounts and treat them as one account. There are a few logical problems which crop up there when the monetary units are not the same throughout the tree. Please clarify your idea of what is needed. -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
